With the Christmas season upon us, ever consider how we attempt to “describe” Jesus? In the video below, Biola University Talbot Seminary Professor Fred Sanders gives a talk about the Two Natures of Christ.
What do you think of the boundaries of Chalcedon as a way of guiding our thinking of Christ?
With Christmas just around the corner, there are usually feature articles in magazines or television shows that examines the historical aspects of Jesus. Some will be quite skeptical while others may give the Biblical version of events a fair hearing.
Linked here is an item from Bible Archeology Review that tackles that question in somewhat longer form than your typical items in a popular magazine.
Here are a few excepts to whet your appetite to look over the whole thing:
The sources normally discussed fall into three main categories: (1) classical (that is, Greco-Roman), (2) Jewish and (3) Christian. But when people ask whether it is possible to prove that Jesus of Nazareth actually existed, as John P. Meier pointed out decades ago, “The implication is that the Biblical evidence for Jesus is biased because it is encased in a theological text written by committed believers. What they really want to know is: Is there extra-Biblical evidence … for Jesus’ existence?” Therefore, this article will cover classical and Jewish writings almost exclusively.
Tacitus’s terse statement about “Christus” clearly corroborates the New Testament on certain historical details of Jesus’ death. Tacitus presents four pieces of accurate knowledge about Jesus: (1) Christus, used by Tacitus to refer to Jesus, was one distinctive way by which some referred to him, even though Tacitus mistakenly took it for a personal name rather than an epithet or title; (2) this Christus was associated with the beginning of the movement of Christians, whose name originated from his; (3) he was executed by the Roman governor of Judea; and (4) the time of his death was during Pontius Pilate’s governorship of Judea, during the reign of Tiberius. (Many New Testament scholars date Jesus’ death to c. 29 C.E.; Pilate governed Judea in 26–36 C.E., while Tiberius was emperor 14–37 C.E.)
We can learn quite a bit about Jesus from Tacitus and Josephus, two famous historians who were not Christian. Almost all the following statements about Jesus, which are asserted in the New Testament, are corroborated or confirmed by the relevant passages in Tacitus and Josephus. These independent historical sources—one a non-Christian Roman and the other Jewish—confirm what we are told in the Gospels
As far as we know, no ancient person ever seriously argued that Jesus did not exist.33 Referring to the first several centuries C.E., even a scholar as cautious and thorough as Robert Van Voorst freely observes, “… [N]o pagans and Jews who opposed Christianity denied Jesus’ historicity or even questioned it.”
In the video below, Professor Craig Kenner of Asbury Theology Seminary discusses the significance and meaning of the genealogies of Jesus.
Screen shot of our three site teaching event on Matthew 24-25. To see the video of this presentation go here.
4 perspectives on Revelation, 3 options on the Millennium and 4 possible scenarios for the Rapture (gathering of saints).
Bottom line: Jesus is coming again, be ready and be faithful!